Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clow Water Systems

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to McWane. No arguments for deletion aside from the nominator but there is not really enough comments to establish a consensus. Closing as "merge" as a good argument is made for doing so but consider this a "no consensus" close. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:57, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Clow Water Systems (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

All that I can find is trivial mentions. Fails WP:CORP. Iowateen (talk) 00:42, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak Keep This seems like a minor advertisement, but it also seems like the company is notable since it is used throughout the country. I believe that if more references can be found, it will be worthy of a complete keep support on my part. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 00:46, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 13:30, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 23:12, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge to McWane. Clow Water systems is a division of McWane. I couldn't find any substantial sources to establish this division as independently notable. Given the information in the history section showing how long the company has been in business, there may be offline sources that could establish notability. A merge will preserve the information in this article and allow for a spin-out of independent notability is established later on. -- Whpq (talk) 16:34, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.