Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Club Filter Melbourne

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep closed as an WP:AGF keep there has been effort to address concerns raised in this afd all delete recomendations were prior to these edits. Gnangarra 04:47, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Club Filter Melbourne (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

This article has been nominated for three speedy deletions (twice sucessfull), once not. An Admin has suggested to nominate it as an AfD. I blieve the article is unsourced and unreferenced. It is about a once a week club night, in Melbourne Australia. All over the world every night these occour had many of them have had musicians play who went on to become stars. My basis for nomination is the article is unsouced/unreferenced and non notable. Rehnn83 ^Talk 10:38, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. -- Canley 10:43, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - The references given are not verifiable due to insufficient citation, and the subject matter's notability has not been asserted.--Yeti Hunter 10:51, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Agreed with nom - no citation (WP:V and possible WP:RS), and no notability established (WP:N). Orderinchaos 00:18, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. I changed my mind: Editor of Mixmag, and an Inpress article, are provided as references already. These loose referenes should be reworked as citations then there would be no arguement to notability.Garrie 01:05, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I have asked Nina to rework her prose to more formally acknowledge her sources. I agree that currently there is insufficient information to create back-references from what is already in the article. If this is not done the article should be deleted as it is not verifiable.Garrie 05:41, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete unless sources are established. Google News Archive comes up with a couple of references in What's On guides. [1]. Capitalistroadster 02:53, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep and allow to expand. This will be covered very extensively in magazines. It has been recorded as a notable club in the Triple J techno timeline. See also [2][3][4][5]. John Vandenberg 06:19, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 06:20, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.