Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clutter (organizing)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 19:17, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Clutter (organizing) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:DICTDEF with semi-promotional web links. VG ☎ 22:20, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 12:40, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:08, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete unless someone can tell me how this could ever be more than a dictionary definition. PHARMBOY (TALK) 01:45, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Even if this were to be completely modified to move it away from a mere definition, I think it would move to being an essay, which would be deleted as well. Soliloquial (talk) 03:33, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, nothing substantive to save. -- Consumed Crustacean (talk) 03:59, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.