Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CmSiteNavigation
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 01:52, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- CmSiteNavigation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
I can't find any reliable sources that show notability and it seems to be entirely non-notable. Schuym1 (talk) 03:02, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as its the only FF extension I know of that exposes the LINK element in the UI, and quite comprehensively too. Support for this feature has historically been poor in browsers for a very long time despite LINK being part of HTML since 1995.[1] This support makes the subject notable. ⇔ ChristTrekker 03:48, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- That doesn't show notability per the guidelines and policies. Schuym1 (talk) 03:52, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The article was nominated within hours of its creation. Maybe it could be given a fair chance for editors to add references. ⇔ ChristTrekker 15:46, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- That doesn't show notability per the guidelines and policies. Schuym1 (talk) 03:52, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete insufficient reliable sources to demonstrate notability per WP:GNG. Icewedge (talk) 04:17, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. —Schuym1 (talk) 08:37, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:34, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 13:45, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Article has now had time for notability to be established, and this hasn't been done. Does not meet guidelines for inclusion, fails notability criteria, and thus should be deleted. Even if it is the only product that does a certain thing a certain way, if the notability cannot be established according to Wikipedia guidelines, the article should be deleted. A fair chance has been provided, and the article still fails the criteria, so delete. Theseeker4 (talk) 15:47, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.