Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Co-occurring disorders

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Dual diagnosis. ItsZippy ^{(talk • contributions)} 19:27, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Co-occurring disorders

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nominating for deletion per WP:NOTESSAY. Appears to be an essay containing original research. May be a worthy topic, but this attempt is not encyclopedic. West Eddy (talk) 23:05, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:32, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:33, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, essay, and presumably covered elsewhere in an encyclopedic fashion (such as Comorbidity). Hairhorn (talk) 01:53, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete (no salvageable information), then replace with a redirect to Dual diagnosis. WhatamIdoing (talk) 16:19, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Dual diagnosis per WhatamIdoing. "Co-occurring disorders" and "Dual diagnosis" are synonyms. (While I have no specific objection to deletion before the redirect is set up, I don't see the point.) --Lambiam 18:52, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or redirect, in any case remove the existing material, which is pure OR. Looie496 (talk) 22:06, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.