- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Wizardman 20:28, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- CoSort (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Speedy deleted 3x as failing to assert notability, deleted by prod once for failure to meet the threshold of WP:CORP. Latest recreation still does not make notability clear, and is very spammy. Pastordavid (talk) 19:44, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep The article cites a few well-known tech journals in its external links section. I would recommend a good rewrite rather than a speedy delete. Ecoleetage (talk) 19:46, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Non-notable. Seems like a PR piece.Renee (talk) 20:21, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete WP:AB => WP:COI. We don't take autobiographies because they're too tainted. Also author can't decide whether to discuss his company proper or its products. Potatoswatter (talk) 22:40, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as it stands now. Would suggest that an article could be written about Innovative Routines International (IRI), Inc. if reliable sources are used and it can avoid looking like self promotion. Perhaps using other "good" business articles as templates. Jasynnash2 (talk) 10:43, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.