Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coates (supercomputer)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 16:19, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Coates (supercomputer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- Delete (previously speedied, and recreated) per Wikipedia is not a crystal ball Mayalld (talk) 16:03, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Certainly, there are many placeholding works in progress pertaining to things soon to happen in the collection. I would hope you leave it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gnkline (talk • contribs) 18:30, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Even the smallest stubs are supposed to be about things that
do or have existed(I should say meet WP policy guidelines). See also Wikipedia:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. As it stands, the article reads like PR for Purdue. Jlg4104 (talk) 00:30, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Even the smallest stubs are supposed to be about things that
- Delete. Does not seem to be notable (yet). Note that most of the third-party sources linked in the article are actually talking about Steele (supercomputer), this computer's predecessor. JulesH (talk) 19:09, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - "to be built." When it's built and becomes notable, an article then may be appropriate. Jlg4104 (talk) 21:15, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.