- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Robert T | @ | C 02:19, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
This appears to be original research, and entering the article name into Google only returns two hits. Denelson83 04:56, 10 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Concur with Denelson83. The two hits he mentions aren't about the article topic, either. Article says it's not in medical dictionaries yet, but it seems like the kind of thing that would be discussed on line somewhere. Okay, groups.google.com did come up with one hit for the relevant meaning. Anyway, seems like a neologism. FreplySpang (talk) 05:05, 10 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete under WP:NOR and WP:V. No verifiable evidence of these claims let alone from a vaguely credible source. Capitalistroadster 05:20, 10 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete OR/per nom --Rogerd 05:31, 12 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. *drew 00:46, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.