- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Daniel (talk) 11:47, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- CocoWalk (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Small mall that lacks WP:SIGCOV DirtyHarry991 (talk) 06:36, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Shopping malls and Florida. DirtyHarry991 (talk) 06:36, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
- Disagree, the article is sparse at best but the actual place is a fairly significant shopping center in that area. Skroob (talk) 15:17, 5 December 2023 (UTC) — Note to closing admin: Skroob (talk • contribs) is the creator of the page that is the subject of this AfD.
- For the article to exist for 18 years...there's really nothing significant stated on it. – The Grid (talk) 21:16, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
- Here are links I could find of sources to satisfy this significant coverage requirement. I am currently unable to add these to the article, but I will be sharing the links here.
- https://www-newspapers-com.wikipedialibrary.idm.oclc.org/image/650904536
- https://www-newspapers-com.wikipedialibrary.idm.oclc.org/article/the-miami-herald-cocowalk-property-1984/69726780/
- https://www-newspapers-com.wikipedialibrary.idm.oclc.org/image/656236427
- https://www-newspapers-com.wikipedialibrary.idm.oclc.org/image/657073065
- https://www-newspapers-com.wikipedialibrary.idm.oclc.org/image/635805980
- https://www-newspapers-com.wikipedialibrary.idm.oclc.org/image/642257530
- https://www-newspapers-com.wikipedialibrary.idm.oclc.org/image/637566270 BurgeoningContracting 16:00, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
- Comment - The contributions where I have synthesized information from the sources into the article. BurgeoningContracting 04:47, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 07:39, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Excellent sleuthing, BurgeoningContracting. Meets SIGCOV. Acebulf (talk | contribs) 09:24, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. I do not agree that this article lacks significant coverage. From my perspective, there are sufficient reliable sources to support what is written in the article. ST7733B (talk) 23:46, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.