Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coco Tangalla

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KTC (talk) 14:38, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Coco Tangalla

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Was originally proposed for a speedy delete but was contested by the article's creator. The article was bordering on self promotion however I have tried to remove all the promotional content. I still believe however that it fails the basic WP:GNG - in that it lacks any signficiant independent coverage that establishes the topics notability. Dan arndt (talk) 05:23, 19 October 2015 (UTC) Dan arndt (talk) 05:23, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sri Lanka-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 06:01, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 01:56, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as I see nothing better. SwisterTwister talk 01:56, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam Sailor ^Talk! 11:14, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete lack of good coverage Rainbow unicorn (talk) 19:18, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - not enough coverage to show notability. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:26, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.