- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was withdrawn. ✗plicit 11:22, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Code Black (DJ) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not appear to meet notability. The DJ Mag list is good, even if the entry is a tad brief, but I think that's the only good source here. Aside from that, you've got a database, one song charting unimpressively, a Sydney Morning Herald list which turned out to be just a list of names with no critical discussion, and his record label's website. Could not find anything additional, though anyone who knows a good archive of DJ/EDM publications should give a good look just in case there's more there. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 10:29, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Australia. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 10:29, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Keep I have identified further sourcing - 2 critical reviews in WP:RSMUSIC Mixmag, including one of his remix productions being chosen as "Tune of the Month". Various specialty e-zine publications focused on EDM do count him a big deal - with one stating Code Black is "Australian hardstyle royalty" and another stating in a critical review him being a highlight of Electric Daisy Carnival 2023. Also per WP:MUSICBIO#12 the subject has had a significant segment on national radio (BBC Radio 1), now cited in the article. On top of the DJ Mag coverage, and the charting, and an RS stating him in the top 15 DJs in Australia, sufficient here to presume notability in my view. ResonantDistortion 17:08, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- You have improved the article significantly already, to the point where I'm willing to withdraw this nomination. Glad to see it happen. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 19:20, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.