Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Code d' Odalisque
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 01:36, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Code d' Odalisque (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested prod. Proposed deletion reason (not by me) was "no assertion of notability". Prod removed without improvements. There are only 50 distinct Google hits[1] for the term, which is very little for any sex-related search. There are no Google books hits[2], even though there are a fair number of books on BDSM available on Google books. Fails WP:N. Fram (talk) 13:34, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I don't see any genuine third-party sources here. Brianyoumans (talk) 13:51, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, non-notable neologism; I find no coverage in reliable sources, and removing the space does not help. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:05, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:18, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.