Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Codenamed bob

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete per WP:SNOW and also speedy deletion criteria WP:A7. Please see my comments below. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:10, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Codenamed bob

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to be a notable film. Searching for sources results only in profiles and not significant coverage. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 03:12, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 03:13, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - No reliable 3rd party references found. Speedy delete seems appropriate. WP:TOOSOON at best. Cotton2 (talk) 03:25, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:27, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: There was another article created at Codename Bob. I've merged the two histories together since they're by the same person. Offhand this looks like it might be speedyable as A7 because it's a YouTube video. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:54, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per CSD A7 as noted by Tokyogirl. This is web content that doesn't assert significance. TonyBallioni (talk) 22:53, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I'm just going to stick a fork in this one. It's a viable A7 candidate and I don't think that this would survive even if it lasted a full week. I'll also note that I had to block the editor that created the article, Sunnyrocks31 because they kept trying to stop the AfD by creating the article elsewhere, removing the AfD template, and even moving the AfD'd article to Wikipedia:Codenamed Bob and marking it as speedy deletion per user request - and then trying to create the article sans AfD template in the old ___location. It's all so deliberate and disruptive that I don't think that a temporary block would stop this type of disruption. Since there were so many attempts to evade AfD I'm also going to salt the various entries to hopefully avoid recreation - although I do believe it's likely that the user will come back under a new account name and try to recreate the article in some form or fashion. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:08, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.