- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Closing per obvious consensus. — Aitias // discussion 02:00, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Codeprofiler (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
No reliable third party sources. Product has only been around since Sept 2008 so difficult to believe it's notable. Omarcheeseboro (talk) 16:29, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Product is not notable per guidelines. ChildofMidnight (talk) 18:28, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Product fails notability guidelines. No reliable sources, the only sources cited are its own site. DavidWS (contribs) 19:05, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not notable. Aymatth2 (talk) 21:08, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 09:37, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I originally prodded this article a month or so ago, and also did what I could to cleanup obvious COI and advert issues. I see no evidence to suggest this article fulfills the General Notability Guideline by being discussed frequently in independent 3rd party sources, beyond basic release announcements. -Verdatum (talk) 21:02, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.