Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Codrin Arsene (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 07:45, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Codrin Arsene

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This person clearly does not meet the notability standard EnterBit232 WR (talk) 03:30, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:14, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:14, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:14, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - the sources consist either of Arsene's own columns or quotations of Arsene's own views. What is glaringly absent is the "significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources which are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject" demanded by WP:BASIC, and so we should delete. - Biruitorul ^Talk 19:35, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:50, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:33, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Arsene has written one article in a peer reviewed publication (well, I am being generous and assuming it is peer reviewed, I am not positve). That is no where near passing the notability guidelines for academics, and his work comes no where near the notability guidelines for writers in general either. No clear passing of any notability guidelines.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:21, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.