Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CoffeeHouse Digest

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 00:16, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fairly well written article about a magazine that hasn't been published yet. Francs2000 00:27, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as WP:VSCA. Brian G. Crawford 00:33, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Brian.  RasputinAXP  c 00:36, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete nn.ßlηguγΣη | Have your say!!! - review me 01:50, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete not very notable. joturner 02:19, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete this is like fortune telling or science fiction --AlainV 02:21, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, nn, spam. --Terence Ong 02:29, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above. 66.146.189.70 05:37, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Brian. DarthVader 09:55, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep I agree that the article, despite its brevity, is well written. It will be relevant once the magazine comes out, and I see no strong reason to get rid of it. If articles like Windows Vista, about upcoming products; are kept, why not this one? Jared W 11:06, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • If/when the magazine comes out and becomes notable, an article can be written. Until then, delete. Zetawoof^(ζ) 11:55, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Let's not overstate the wonderfulness of this article, which sounds like advertising. Crystal-ballism. ProhibitOnions 11:41, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per ProhibitOnions. Metamagician3000 12:18, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete non-notable, spam. --Siva1979^{Talk to me} 14:44, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above. --Srikeit^{(talk ¦ ✉)} 01:44, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and Restore when the magazine comes out. WP:NOT a crystal ball M1ss1ontomars2k4 01:49, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • When it comes out and becomes notable perhaps? Notability is also a concern. Zetawoof^(ζ) 04:50, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.