- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. John254 03:02, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Coin snatching (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Pretty much a how-to guide for a parlour trick with no indication of notability. Created about a month ago by an SPA. Delete. Blanchardb-Me•MyEars•MyMouth-timed 17:55, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - we're not a guide for magicians. Biruitorul (talk) 18:40, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep The Guinness Book of Records has been keeping track of coin snatching feats since 1990, if not earlier. The article certainly needs some cleanup, but this parlor trick does have a minor claim to notability. Zagalejo^^^ 18:41, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep per Zagalejo. Hobit (talk) 19:47, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep per Zagalejo. Definitely needs rewording though, including reference to reliable sources. Wiw8 (talk) 20:38, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep if valid references can be added to the article. (jarbarf) (talk) 03:27, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Per above; seems notable enough. ♠TomasBat 16:15, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphaned, unreferenced, and deadend issues have been resolved: [1] & [2]. ♠TomasBat 19:11, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per TomasBat, who has a wonderful signature file. Coccyx Bloccyx (talk) 21:03, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.