- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 11:21, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Cold Glass (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
seven minute film being made by amateurs for fun, has not even been been shot yet. Beach drifter (talk) 22:54, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Commet Is there no appropriate speedy for this increasingly common situation? Beach drifter (talk) 23:50, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Let me be polite and just say WP:CRYSTAL and wish these kids all the best. Drawn Some (talk) 23:07, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - fails Notability (films) by a mile. After reading the author's talk page, I feel less polite: John W. Stevenson a.k.a. Semisonic30, please read that guideline and stop wasting our time with articles about films you're thinking about making. JohnCD (talk) 09:21, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Fails WP:NFF in all ways. Fails general notability with no sources writing about the film. The only reference in the article is to his own livejournal page. Fails verifiability as there is no coverage about it at all. -- Whpq (talk) 13:29, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. —JohnCD (talk) 18:00, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and considering salting, as my wikiguts tell me this will be recreated sooner rather than later - Vartanza (talk) 05:32, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.