Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cold fusion theories

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect to cold fusion. Being bold here a closing early - Peripitus (Talk) 10:47, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cold fusion theories (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Yet more original research from a user trying to promote his non-notable physics theory. This page has been cleaned up a bit, but it is still riddled with bias and OR and anything useful can go in Cold fusion anyway. See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quantum Ring Theory, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Don Borghi's experiment and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/"Zitterbewegung and Cold Fusion". Hut 8.5 07:45, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect as this article is named after a topic that is covered in sufficient detail in cold fusion. Despite its name it doesn't even seem to concern itself with cold fusion but rather with electron capture. Handschuh-^{talk to me} 08:37, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete As above. It's a platform for the user pushing his personal theory. It's not an article about Cold Fusion Theories in general. The main Cold Fusion page makes this one irrelevant. Alberon 09:40, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Cold Fusion per Handschuh. MLA 09:44, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.