Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coldfire Studios

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 16:54, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Coldfire Studios (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Doesn't seem to assert notability. User:Milik was trying to nominate but kept having trouble. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Many otters • One hammer • HELP)} 20:14, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per my {{prod-2}}: "Company's only product was deleted at AfD: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Space - Glory Through Conquest (Second nomination)" Plus they have now sold off this game to another company, so have no current products at all. --ThaddeusB (talk) 20:19, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Thaddeus and pile on a prod-3 from over here. JBsupreme (talk) 20:50, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I can't find any reliable sources. Drawn Some (talk) 20:55, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- ThaddeusB (talk) 23:40, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletion discussions. -- ThaddeusB (talk) 23:41, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 02:05, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Evidently not notable per above. Haipa Doragon (talk • contributions) 02:38, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete - Clear spam article. DreamGuy (talk) 13:34, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • On what basis? Haipa Doragon (talk • contributions) 14:57, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • This article was created as a vandalism [Edition] user who created this article few minutes later modified a date page with a birth date of Michael Coulton [of that edit] so I suspect that it fact was Michael Coulton who per this revision was an employee of Coldfire Studios [in question]. I think we can say that initial article should have been deleted as vandalism. Instead it was edited and updated. But it is in my opinion just nicely edited spam. I feel sorry for efforts that went toward this article but it is not about a notable subject. Thousands of companies ship product, but don't make it in the long run, I don't think just the fact that company exist warrants wiki article about it. Milik (talk) 16:33, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.