- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete. (aeropagitica) 01:10, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
In the referenced article written by Bernie DeKoven it states A word I actually made up. A word I coined so I could describe to people what a "good meeting" is like: CoLiberation. I believe this, then, qualifies as neologism James084 18:56, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom Cursive 23:57, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Just my 2-cents here: though I coined the term, it has had some significant usage outside of my direct sphere of influence. Most people have found the word very useful in describing something that has hitherto not been described - namely the experience of "shared flow" - flow being a term Csikszentmihalyi made up, in a similar manner. He is familar with my terh and has endorsed it. Please let me know what I need to do to correct any "neologistic" concerns. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cybernie (talk • contribs)
- Note: relisting 08/03/06, for great justice. fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 03:39, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as WP:NEO. The concept already exists: it's called 'harmony.' --die Baumfabrik 04:29, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as neologism. A google search seems mainly to turn up entries by the creator himself, with no indication that the word is really catching on with anyone else. Fan1967 05:13, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete; WP:NEO applies, per above admission. Unverifiable as being in widespread use. --Kinu t/c 05:30, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as nn neologism. savidan(talk) (e@) 09:05, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as neologism. --Terence Ong 09:56, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete 250 Googles, no reliable sources, and even the unreliable ones don't seem to agree. Just zis Guy you know? 13:12, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as nnn Computerjoe 22:28, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.