- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:42, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Colin Burnham (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable. No evidence of notability for the person or the books; no reliable third party sources Hairhorn (talk) 18:09, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:10, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I'm not persuaded by the sources available, though clearly there might be something out there I'm missing. As with any active author, Usual Caveats apply. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 19:23, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 00:25, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete fails WP:BIO. gnews reveals no indepth coverage. LibStar (talk) 06:50, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.