- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:06, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
- Colin Saldanha (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not much to his credit. Very likely to fail WP:GNG. Greenbörg (talk) 07:12, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 09:54, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 09:55, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:01, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. I'm literally not seeing any reason whatsoever why this should ever have been created in the first place — literally nothing here is a notability claim in the slightest, and none of the sourcing (a mix of primary sources and local community weeklies in his own hometown) is adequate to get him over WP:GNG in lieu. He's got quite a bit to his credit at the community level, but no reason why the rest of the world needs to read about it. Bearcat (talk) 21:43, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete a non-notable medical doctor.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:03, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
- delete seems like a good guy but fails GNG. Jytdog (talk) 02:50, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.