Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Collaborative governance

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete - Mailer Diablo 13:47, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Collaborative governance (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Tagged for speedy deletion with the justification "original research". Article's pretty much useless as written; though the phrase gets a respectable number of google hits, it doesn't seem to have a well-defined meaning any more than any other adjective-noun combination. Opabinia regalis 04:42, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, OR. Edeans 21:20, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nomination Shaundakulbara 06:28, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, buzzword, so broad as to be meaningless. No sense in bothering to maintain and fix up an article on this, whatever "this" is. — coelacan talk — 10:29, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.