Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Collect Call from Mars
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 17:08, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Collect Call from Mars (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable band per WP:MUS. --SquidSK (1MC•log) 14:39, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Definitely fails WP:BAND. No secondary sources describing them. On a non-policy note, awesome name for a band. Angryapathy (talk) 14:55, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Agree with Angryapathy on the band name, as well as the lack of reliable sources. Appears to fail WP:BAND. Gongshow Talk 19:06, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this band. Joe Chill (talk) 19:31, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:51, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete (and reverse charges). NN. --Epeefleche (talk) 13:52, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Did anyone come across the articles in the Dutch magazine De Echo? (For example) I'm not sure how reliable a source it is, but it does have an entry in the Dutch Wikpedia (seems to be a free magazine with a large circulation). Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 06:10, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.