Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Collective Phase One

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 01:39, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Collective Phase One

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Collective Phase One (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:REFBOMBing with WP:FICTREFerences to conceal lack of notability. One source cites only as a passing mention. It also fails WP:ORG as a production house or organisation. The Doom Patrol (talk) 18:51, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Arts, and Film. The Doom Patrol (talk) 18:51, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:48, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:47, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak delete The references are an odd mix of interviews, profiles and movie reviews which have no reference to the apparent subject of the article, despite their claimed involvement in some of the films. Weak delete because I cannot read Malayalam, so I cannot assess potential sources in that language, or read the organisation's Facebook page which is also linked. Obviously the FB page wouldn't be a valid indicator of notability, but it might help establish what else there is out there about this group. JohnmgKing (talk) 11:47, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.