Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colmek Systems Engineering

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Deor (talk) 10:57, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Colmek Systems Engineering

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Advert for company lacking notability. Sourced by passing mentions and non mentions trying to assert notability by inheritance. duffbeerforme (talk) 11:07, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Utah-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:18, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:18, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:19, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep : Doesn't read like an advert, describes new technology that has been developed for undersea searches. The references seem valid to me. Wayne Jayes 14:31, 28 June 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Waynejayes (talk • contribs)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 04:38, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - agree the suggestion here seems to be that the company has inherited notability from companies this company has worked with. It doesn't work that way. We need significant coverage about the company itself in independent reliable sources for the subject to meet WP:CORPDEPTH. I don't think we're there yet. St★lwart¹¹¹ 11:56, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, having notable clients and working on interesting projects is all well and good, but I don't think that adds up to notability. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 07:19, 13 July 2014 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.