- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-02-11 04:06Z
After reading this article, I still don't get what "Colony" actually is. Also, the only reference on this page is the supposed company's web site. This fails WP:CORP. Diez2 16:36, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - fails WP:CORP; no evidence of independent third-party coverage. Also doesn't make much sense. Walton monarchist89 16:44, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Probably an advertisement, although too confusing to be sure Citicat 17:30, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete advertisement-like, plus lacks context and is only linked from articles referring to CMS products. WP:CORP would apply. Roadmr (t|c) 18:00, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Yet more spam. Down the -atory with it. Anthony Appleyard 18:38, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Either a business that fails WP:CORP, or a website host that fails WP:WEB; lack of context makes it hard to say which. - Smerdis of Tlön 20:43, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as nn. --MaNeMeBasat 14:30, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.