- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. ChetblongTalkSign 05:31, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Colour chess (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
No evidence that this chess variant is played outside the website ([1]) which published the game. There are several notable chess variants, but they tend to receive some coverage in books such as The Oxford Companion to Chess or Pritchard's Popular Chess Variants. I cannot see any evidence that this game has that kind of coverage. Since the article is fairly old, there might be something I don't know which could affect notability, so I am putting this on AFD rather than PROD. (I have prod-ed a couple of other chess variants today as well in case anybody wants to review them.) Sjakkalle (Check!) 15:49, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 16:20, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete non-notable; fails WP:N and WP:NFT. Percy Snoodle (talk) 16:30, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. An easy black-and-white choice. I vaguely remember Afd'ing a very similar article (maybe Color chess). Clarityfiend (talk) 19:35, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nominator. SyG (talk) 21:13, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not notable and article doesn't make any sense. Mm40 (talk) 20:00, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.