Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Columbia Classics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 04:19, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Columbia Classics (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. Non-notable collection of otherwise notable films. TheRealFennShysa (talk) 15:32, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete No claim of notability. EEng (talk) 17:20, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Useful reference page. The notability of the page is rooted in the notability of the collection - which is based on the noteworthiness of the films included in it. ntnon (talk) 05:31, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 17:55, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete now more than ever Notability is not inherited. Pure spam. EEng (talk) 06:04, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.