Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comedy of the commons

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:13, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Term apparently only used by Lawrence Lessig, and apparently only once. --InShaneee 01:21, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge with Tragedy of the commons, a well-established concept. Tevildo 01:28, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete not even notable enough for a place in the Tragedy of the commons article. It's a nifty little play-on-words that Lawrence Lessig used, thinking he was clever. AdamBiswanger1 01:30, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - man, when Leonardo DiCaprio became famous for Titanic, and I was younger and sillier, I came up with Leonerdo DiCrappio. Pretty funny, huh? Do I get my own article now? ^Triana_C 01:38, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Not until you've made a Star Wars fan film in your back garden. Get with the program. -- GWO
  • My sister and I called him DiCrapprio even before Titanic came out. Oh, and also delete. - Che Nuevara: ^{Join the Revolution} 11:59, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, essentially fails WP:NEO. --Coredesat 02:06, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Is Reason a reliable source? I'd say it's worth a one-liner in the Tragedy of the anticommons article (Done). We can put a redirect there though, Lessing is well-known enough that this might be a search term. ~ trialsanderrors 02:43, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom and Coredesat, plus a shout-out for Riana_dzasta. Your DiCrappio article would fit well in WP:BJAODN or Uncyclopedia. Agent 86 03:15, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete neologisms must die. Jammo (SM247) 05:58, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, I like Lessig and what he has to say... but this does not justify its own article. It is just not that notable yet. - Motor (talk) 11:14, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete -- per nom -- MrDolomite 14:19, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, neologism. -- Docether 18:05, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - per nom. --Kungfu Adam ^(talk) 20:02, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Move ^{23 June 2006 23:33} Ste4k wrote: Move to WP:BJ based on WP:PN.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.