Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Command & Conquer: Red Alert 3

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Deletion review nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 12:17, 23 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This game was announced in a single mass-e-mail by one guy who was high-up on the development ladder. But he has since been sacked. There has been no word from anyone regarding this title, not even EA. This leads me to the conclusion that it started development but was canned. I don't believe we will ever see this, nor will we see Tiberian Twlight or Renegade 2, but at least those games had some details and concept art. RA3 has had a few lines announced by someone who doesn't even work for EA anymore. Ferret 15:15, 16 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. ESkog | ^Talk 15:59, 16 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Based on the reasons provided by Ferret, along with the sheer lack of content in the article, I'm pretty sure this is covered by WP:NOT crystal ball. if it turns out in the future to be a real game in development, the article can be recreated at that point in time. Saberwyn 08:48, 17 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Jkelly 02:13, 18 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, as per Ferret and Saberwyn. ╫ 25 ^ring-a-ding 04:56, 21 October 2005 (UTC) ╫[reply]
• Strong Redirect, this article shouldn't be kept, but it shouldn't be deleted either. There will likely be a Red Alert 2 sequel in the future, and this article should just be redirected to the main Command & Conquer page (which already has some stuff about known facts about a possible RA3 from EA, so people looking for RA3 will be sent to the proper place) so it won't have to undergo a vote for undeletion in the future. (BTW Ferret, that email wasn't the first possibility of RA3, it has been hinted by Westwood and EA in the past) Jareand 04:37, 22 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete — mæstro ^t/c, 09:17, 22 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.