Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Commander's call

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. AustralianRupert (talk) 01:44, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Commander's call

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Topic title is self explanatory. The three external links all link to the same page, which does not illustrate the use of this term, but the use of the term ‘all call’. No real substance to the article. Mccapra (talk) 06:02, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:00, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:00, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:DICTDEF which is all the current entry is. If these is an appropriate redirect target - could be redirected there.Icewhiz (talk) 11:09, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger _{One ping only} 01:01, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Icewhiz. Consider entering into Wiktionary.--Georgia Army Vet Contribs Talk 21:34, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.