Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Committee of Thinking Class Humans
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Sango123 17:59, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Notability question, no hits on google —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ackoz (talk • contribs) .
- Delete. No assertion of notability, and no Google hits, perhaps surprising for a group of engineers. - Tangotango 13:42, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Appears to be nonsense. (Note the following quote):
However one must be wary for there are grave dangers that lurk in The Holy Place. Places where the sane, dare not tread for fear that one's very sanity could be rent asunder.
Delete. Em-jay-es 16:14, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Nonnotable, OR, Nonsense---yet another trifecta. ---Charles 17:24, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Mmmyeah, all of the above. -- Docether 19:26, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete It's nonsense, but not patent nonsense, unfortunately. Danny Lilithborne 20:41, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]- Delete per Tangotango. ... discospinster talk 20:46, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete for patent nonsense. --Coredesat 22:58, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment After looking over WP:PN, I think this is patent nonsense, and have changed my vote. --Coredesat 22:59, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Changing my vote to Speedy delete as per above. Danny Lilithborne 01:05, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.