Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Common man protection force

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete — Caknuck (talk) 06:21, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Common man protection force (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Fails to establish notability. Nothing comprhensive on Google. No references and does not adhere to WP:NPOV Hammer1980·^talk 12:04, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. No reliable evidence of notability (and, yes, it sounds promotional). Pastordavid (talk) 17:54, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 18:01, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak delete. It is verifiable, but doesn't seem to be worth an article as it would be nothing more than a stub.--h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 11:31, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Per Research. Twenty Years 15:19, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.