Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Communication Risks and Best Practice in Global Software Development

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 02:40, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Communication Risks and Best Practice in Global Software Development

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previous Prod with rationale "No evidence that this book meets the notability guidelines.". Prod was removed by the article creator along with maintenance tags. The issues remain, so I'm bringing this to AfD on the same rationale as the previous Prod. AllyD (talk) 11:27, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Delete completely non-notable book. Wikipedia is a not a self-promotion tool. Minfo (talk) 12:19, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete Nothing notable here whatsoever. MsFionnuala (talk) 23:20, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:03, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:04, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: no indication of notability neither in the article, nor off-site. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 01:14, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Also, some sections stink of having been plagiarized directly from editor's notes of the book itself. Bearian (talk) 20:22, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.