Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Community Informatics (company)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 18:39, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Community Informatics (company)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Company fails notability guidelines. I could not find any reliable sources to establish notability. No official website even available. Tinton5 (talk) 00:05, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Company is notable startup based in New Jersey and official website can be found easily by searching Google. URL is http://ci2informatics.com. Additionally, the company was profiled in NJBIZ recently for their software product. 70.215.70.51 (talk) 00:55, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete, not even a claim to notability. Hairhorn (talk) 15:38, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am not seeing the basis for a speedy delete tag. Numerous other startups in New Jersey and throughout the United States have both been considered notable and covered with their own Wikipedia article. This one happens to be up-and-coming technology company that is notable in government circles and, like 70.215.70.51 mentioned, was profiled recently in NJBIZ. Bonked116 (talk) 17:30, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Any entry for a company with no claim to notability can be speedied. I can't comment on the relevance of coverage in NJBIZ, in part because I can't find it. The rest of your point appears to be a classic "what about x?" argument. Hairhorn (talk) 03:33, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:56, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:57, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:57, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 18:05, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.