Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Community first responder
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep, though if someone wants to begin a discussion on merging, I'm fine with that. Wizardman 19:58, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Community first responder (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Unreferenced and Non notable community. Written like essay. NAHID 12:18, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and expand.I've added a reference for one of the earlier UK examples, although I agree the article could do with more information both about the current state of this tier of the healthcare system in both the UK and elsewhere. Tevildo (talk) 12:39, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]- Neutral. See Certified first responder#UK Community responder schemes, which covers the topic. _Might_ be worth a seperate article, but I'm not as convinced as I was earlier. Tevildo (talk) 14:19, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, but get rid of all the unsourced opinion (ie: everything after the first two articles). Lankiveil (talk) 12:56, 29 December 2007 (UTC).[reply]
- Obvious Keep. I always try to assume good faith, but it does seem to me that the nom hasn't read the article. It was tagged for speedy deletion as a test page 6 minutes after creation when it clearly wasn't, and then 12 minutes after that tag was removed it was nominated here as an "Unreferenced and Non notable community" when it is clearly not about a community. Phil Bridger (talk) 13:18, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep. Not a very good article, but it has a reference and it's more than a dicdef.--h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 13:44, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, having problems posting source links and am working on improving the article over the next few days. —Preceding unsigned comment added by FirstResponder (talk • contribs) 13:55, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Rewrite with NPOV. Jonathan (talk • contribs • complain?) 16:20, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge and redirect - to Certified first responder. The subject is already well covered. When that section gets to big, then split it out, but right now its only repeating whats already being said.Exit2DOS2000•T•C• 08:29, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.