- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Comodo Group. (non-admin closure) Mediran (t • c) 01:32, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comodo Backup (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The subject of this article, a backup app, does not seem to be notable. I tried searching for evidences of notability and the results that came up seemed to ridicule me: There were results from very reputable sources but clicking on them did not yield a review. Here, try yourself: PC World, PC Advisor, PCMag.com, PCReview and PC-WELT. SnapFile, CNET Download.com and Softpedia do not have a review page. Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 07:05, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:35, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect - While Comodo Group is notable, this software does not have enough independent coverage for a separate article. Suggest merge and redirect to the publisher of the software. Dialectric (talk) 20:47, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TBrandley 04:31, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Comodo Group. The software is verifiable as existing, but there are not enough in-depth independent sources for the topic to be notable. Comodo Backup is already listed in the article Comodo Group and Dialectric's recommendation for redirect makes good sense here. --Mark viking (talk) 18:18, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect, no reliable refs for this being notable on its own. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:28, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.