Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison for some Audio Converter

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Valley2city^‽ 02:49, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comparison for some Audio Converter (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

An orphaned, unsourced, dead-end article comparing non-notable software against each other. Alexius08 (talk) 05:43, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete That's an affiliate link to useesoft.com, isn't it? ReverendWayne (talk) 06:08, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nominator, we don't need a comparison between multiple non-notable pieces of software. Thryduulf (talk) 11:19, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. —Thryduulf (talk) 11:19, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - non-notable software compared. Could be speedied as spam, in my humble opinion. -- Scjessey (talk) 15:45, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment see also Comparison for Some Video Converters. Thryduulf (talk) 20:49, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Per nomKMFDM FAN ^(talk!) 20:38, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.