Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of AGI projects
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Shimeru (talk) 19:32, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comparison of AGI projects (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Comparison article that compares a single piece of software, itself barely notable. Pcap ping 18:58, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- Pcap ping 19:00, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as a comparison article that does not actually compare anything. It seems to me that this is more like a list than any comparison. Note that we do have List of artificial intelligence projects. -- Whpq (talk) 16:19, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I think this could've been a useful article if it had sufficient content and data for comparison. Since it doesn't, maybe redirect it to List of artificial intelligence projects if such a redirection is acceptable. --IO Device (talk) 18:28, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Also, the content could be hosted at the AGI wiki at http://agi-wiki.org/ which will liberally host anything related to AGI --ChuckEsterbrook (talk) 11:21, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- at ~1h13min of Approaches to Defining and Evaluating General Intelligence by Pei Wang during AGI Summer School 2009 proposes a similar classification. This could be a more formal basis to restart such a page. Utopiah (talk) 13:09, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.