Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of file sharing networks
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. W.marsh 19:35, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comparison of file sharing networks (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Seem's unnecessary, doesn't really compare anything. More details about clients than a comparisan. had prodded but user removed Matt - TheFearow 21:56, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment- It appears to be the result of a split discussion at Talk:Peer-to-peer. The original content appears to be from Peer-to-peer#Networks, protocols and applications. -wizzard2k (C•T•D) 22:14, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment-User has also created other articles with identical content (minus AFD tag) under different names. I changed them to redirects. Matt - TheFearow 22:25, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. It seems to me an arbitrary collection of data. I see nothing wrong with the idea of having a comparison of file sharing networks (although I think this is quite small enough to fit into Peer-to-peer), but there is no real context here, no explanation of why any of this is being compared. Comparison of file sharing applications has the amount of context I think should be aimed for. Someguy1221 15:43, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 18:01, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.