Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of knowledge base management software
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 04:33, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comparison of knowledge base management software (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Essentially original research and a link farm of non-notable entries. -- Boffob (talk) 02:00, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - there was a previous, withdrawn AfD. Didn't quite figure out how to link it here in this new one.--Boffob (talk) 02:05, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nominator arguments --Snowded TALK 10:26, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - This article should not be deleted as it contains valuable information for knowledge managers worldwide to help them figure out the features of knowledge management software solutions — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.173.146.254 (talk • contribs • WHOIS) 11:38, 13 August 2010
- Comment - I have restored the comments deleted by this IP's edit -- John of Reading (talk) 12:49, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.
- Delete per nomination. Agree that this is a link farm and original research. We are not here to make a directory of any kind of software. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:34, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:59, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.