Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Compassion in World Farming

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) buff bills 7701 12:19, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Compassion in World Farming

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Highly promotional, both for the organization and its causes. and there is no evidence except for their own statements that they did what they claim to have done. If they are notable enough for an article, which I am not sure of, it would be necessary to start over. DGG ( talk ) 23:44, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The organization is certainly notable, and any other issues can be solved through editing. --Michig (talk) 07:05, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I rewrote the article. I think the promotional tone is gone now, and it seems to have clear notability. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 16:46, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:16, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:16, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

keep. The organisation is clearly notable, and deletion will not solve any remaining issues. Awkward42 (talk) [the alternate account of Thryduulf (talk)] 14:38, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.