Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Compliance and ethics program

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 03:17, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Compliance and ethics program

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Compliance and ethics program (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is an argumentative essay and not really an encyclopedic article. Amigao (talk) 02:31, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 06:04, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: This is essentially a term paper, and not a particularly engaging one either. I find it difficult to discern what this page is even trying to be about? --Tautomers_{(T C)} 07:06, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete 27,000 bytes of WP:OR and WP:SYNTH, and its been that way for 15 years. Mlb96 (talk) 07:21, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. LSGH (talk) (contributions) 10:15, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete agree with the nom. Webmaster862 (talk) 02:22, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.