Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comprehensive Patient Administrator
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -Scottywong| chatter _ 18:01, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comprehensive Patient Administrator (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unable to find 3rd party sources referencing this software product. I don't think it is notable. also fwiw, the article was created by the person who wrote the software as far as I can tell. The books referenced for the software are written by the author of the software, thus not 3rd party. KarlB (talk) 03:25, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 17:55, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 17:55, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Non-notable, lacking in sources. Possible speedy delete as a copyvio; the article is a verbatim copy of this description at the company's website. The "references" are also copied from there, and they even copied the downloadable file under "external links" (I just deleted it). --MelanieN (talk) 16:22, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, →Bmusician 00:38, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Agreed that it looks like a copyvio of where MelanieN noted - If a 3rd agrees, I feel it should be speedy deleted - As such it fails WP:RS and by extension fails WP:N. Pmedema (talk) 05:17, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.