Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Compressive Rock
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. — Scientizzle 16:45, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Compressive Rock (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Made up genre of music. The only hit on google is this article. All other hits are about geology. Ridernyc (talk) 22:29, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unless the magazines start writing about compressive rock before this AfD finishes. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 22:31, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Everyone's gotta make up their own genre... Rocket000 (talk) 22:54, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- It's insane I just spent 4 hours going through everything listed in list of rock genres, amazingly this is the only I found that was totally made up. However out of the dozens of pages there are maybe 5 that are well written and sourced. I plan on doing some major editing to industrial rock. What really bothers me is that there is a wikipedia project for music genres and they seem not at all concerned that most of the articles in the project are trash. Ridernyc (talk) 23:08, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, it was the only made up one in the list. Anyway, thanks for going through that, and I know what you mean about the WikiProject and the state of the articles. It is one of the harder areas to work in, though. Rocket000 (talk) 00:47, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I agree and I know, I'm the person who took on cleaning up concept album. I would just like to see more projects be like the Tolkein project group, realize you have a ton of issues with the articles you already have so stop everything and just clean and merge everything. Ridernyc (talk) 01:23, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, it was the only made up one in the list. Anyway, thanks for going through that, and I know what you mean about the WikiProject and the state of the articles. It is one of the harder areas to work in, though. Rocket000 (talk) 00:47, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- It's insane I just spent 4 hours going through everything listed in list of rock genres, amazingly this is the only I found that was totally made up. However out of the dozens of pages there are maybe 5 that are well written and sourced. I plan on doing some major editing to industrial rock. What really bothers me is that there is a wikipedia project for music genres and they seem not at all concerned that most of the articles in the project are trash. Ridernyc (talk) 23:08, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.