Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Computer Science(BSc) : Strathclyde University

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 10:02, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Computer Science(BSc) : Strathclyde University

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Wikipedia is not a course catalog. Article was PROD'ed, but that was denied by a second author. According to this, the article is a school project, but even as such does not meet inclusion criteria. Authors have been instructed on their talk pages as to a proper way to proceed. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 12:54, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No indication that this course is more notable than any other university course. Favonian (talk) 12:58, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unsourced, non notable, poorly written and unencyclopdic. Creators also have a CoI, and claim to be working in directed groups as part of a class project for this CS degree. Wikipedia is not a university prospectus, and this is no more notable than the millions of other university courses. What might be notable is if this was the first CS degree, or something similar, but there are no such claims and I found no reason to assume notability. Verbal chat 13:14, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails WP:N. Joe Chill (talk) 13:56, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete — I do not believe a specific course at a specific university necessitates a page. In addition, I agree with the above. ContinueWithCaution (talk) 13:57, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:N. A copy of the page is already in user-space so {{db-author}} is a possibility if all contributors concur. I have deleted some but possibly not all copyright infringements from both copies and put notes on both talk pages. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 15:40, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete we are not here to publicise a specific course at a specific uni. Darrenhusted (talk) 16:31, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per the above Declan Clam (talk) 17:29, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Each university offers dozens- even hundreds- of degree programs. Except in the rarest of cases, they're going to fail WP:N- and this is not such a case. Bradjamesbrown (talk) 18:33, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - an ill-concieved class project -- Whpq (talk) 16:31, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.