The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz Read! Talk! 23:11, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Con-G (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An article on a small, non-notable fan convention. The sources currently in the article are not reliable sources, being either simple event listings or the (currently down) official website for the event. Searches did not turn up any significant coverage on the event, in either its original form or more recent virtual form, that would allow it to pass the WP:GNG. The article was WP:PRODed back in 2012, but that was contested by the article creator, so I am bringing it to AFD for discussion. Rorshacma (talk) 23:23, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

but it seems lacking too in SIGCOV, also no hits from Google News, not opposed to Draftify if any RS with SIGCOV can be found to support articles keep.Lorraine Crane (talk) 01:19, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.