- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:29, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Conceptmart (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:ORGCRIT. The article is also a WP:PROMO. Bishal Shrestha (talk) 02:37, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Bishal Shrestha (talk) 02:37, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Bishal Shrestha (talk) 02:37, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
- Comment: Another discussion for page created by the founder of same organisation(ref) going on here: here Bishal Shrestha (talk) 02:53, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - I've cleared out the spam, but there's nothing to indicate notability per WP:WEB, WP:CORP or WP:GNG, and no significant coverage online from WP:RS. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (UTC) Tracy Von Doom (talk • contribs) 05:23, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
- Delete There is nothing there. Fails WP:ORGIND and WP:CORPDEPTH. Typical brochure article. scope_creepTalk 22:05, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.